Dave Lucas

Home | About | MySpace | Facebook | Video | Store | FAQ

Sunday, February 18, 2007

Anyone Care for Comments?

Last month I was asked by another blogger if I would delete a comment where a commenter had named (outed) the identity of an individual allegedly involved in a certain situation. I had no problem with that, other than being careful when messing with stuff I've "set" within the Blogger platform. I try to rock Blogger's boat as little as possible: for example, there is only one PC I use when I mess around with the template, because I have some Chinese language links that disappear if I edit the template from any PC that does not have International language packs installed.

Having said that, I did successfully remove said comment, although all of the traffic attracted to that post had already dried up completely. That post has not been visited at all in the last 30 days, except by the person who wanted it removed (I can see all this with my site-trackers). I don't think it did any damage, but it raised my curiosity about posts and comments, and I found this neat little article by Reasonable Man from 2005: Who owns blog comments? Here are a few short excerpts:
"...the author of a blog comment could request that his/her comment be removed from a blog. While it is an easy process to remove a comment, the harm to a blog could be substantial. Especially if the comment removed is central to the community d iscussion/dialogue around a given topic. This could severely impact the value of a blog and reduce its following/readership."

From "Comments" "On the question of removal of comments, one problem is that it is impossible to validate the owner of comments on many blogs. Unless you require some sort of authentication for commenting, anyone can post a comment and say that they are you. Likewise, anyone can ask you to remove a comment and claim that they made it. So you might end up removing a legitimate comment on the request of someone who didn't actually leave it."
I also found a newer article (January 28, 2007) about comments on the revenews site. It's titled Legal Issues with Blog Comments which brings up IP tracking. I'm wondering if in the case of blogspot blogs Google could provide such information, as the site metering device I use only displays data for the last 100 visitors. Previous data is overwritten, although they might keep info on their servers (but I doubt that). So, it is a fuzzy fuzzy area.

I've ranted about comments in the past: I wish I could attract the kind LaShawn Barber does: her comments section looks more like a message board or forum: it's a dialog. The closest I've come to that recently was with my Beyonce post the other day... Pajamas Media blogger Michelle Malkin doesn't allow comments but does allow trackbacks, and in the blue bar of her trackback pop up box it clearly says "Discussion" --- I've tried to leave every door open, so that anyone visiting my blog for the first time may find something they're already familiar with, be it "comments," "trackback," "tags" or "categories." I've also thrown in a "digg" link, and thankfully some readers have used it. Bottom line: if you visit me here, feel free to comment, as I provide two ways to do it, through standard Blogger / Blogspot commenting or via Haloscan's system.

Labels: , , ,

1 Comments:

  • At 8:26 PM, February 18, 2007, Blogger Tag(Carpet)Bagger said…

    Interesting thoughts about comments. Personally I dislike Haloscan since it uses a cookie that I haven't identified yet, which interferes with my ability to maintain a couple of distinct identities for commenting (and yes - the blogger was kind enough to delete my wrong identity comment)

     

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

 
Blog Widget by LinkWithin Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com

The "Dave Lucas" weBLOG contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material available in my efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, religious, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner(s). The comments are property of their respective posters. Everything else © 2006-2009 by me. All Rights Reserved. DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of this moderator's employer or organizations with which he is affiliated.

eXTReMe Tracker